-
Hey Twitter, for the next little while I’ll be live tweeting the ACCME’s Town Hall for medical schools using #accmeTH hashtag. #cmechat0
likes·
0
comments -
I will try to keep the snarky comments to a minimum. Might be tough… #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
And I think I was (mostly) successful with that. Yay me.
-
ACCME working hard to make meeting interactive & engaging. Maybe someday have embrace social media, too? #accmeTH #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Oops, extra “have” in there. In all honesty, though, this Town Hall was miles better than the first one the ACCME attempted a couple years ago. All in all, I thought it went pretty well with no major technical glitches.
-
Honored to be called out by Dr. Kopelow for tweeting the Town Hall. I’ll do my best to keep everything in context… #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
OK, that was unexpected. There I am, the lone tweeter for the meeting (sadly, no second tweeters lurking in the grassy knoll), when Dr. Kopelow announces to everyone “I understand that Derek Warnick is live tweeting this meeting…” and goes on to talk about his hope that any tweets about what is said are put in proper context, etc, etc. Fair enough. Thats always my goal anyway. Still, felt a little awkward getting singled out by name like that. I guess that’s the price of fame <rolls eyes>.
-
Would be great if ACCME joined me in live tweeting sometime to help with context/perspective/etc #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
In my opinion, the best way to assure that tweets about your content are put in proper context is to provide tweets for participants to respond to. I acknowledge that that might seem like a waste of time when it’s only little ol’ me doing the tweeting all alone…
-
Mark Levine from CMS
-
Up first: Mark Levine, CMO, Denver from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Sevices #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Levine: CMS has gone under large transformation due to leadership from the topic (e.g. Don Berwick) #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Levine: CMS needs to align goals of professionals w/ goals of CMS to drive healthcare transformation #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Levine: Prefers the term “professionals” to “providers”. More respectful. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
This is in reference to healthcare professionals/providers, not CME providers.
-
Levine: CME is an accredited CME provider. Mostly do internal programs (RSS) but believes they could do more with edu community #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Well, that makes no sense. CMS is an accredited CME provider.
-
Levine: Asks, how can CMS support your activities to for medical professionals and drive transformation? #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Levine: current system (fee for service, silo-ed care) makes it difficult for professionals to help each other. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Siloed? Silo-ed? Silod? I have no clue…
-
Levine: curriculum development in CME is hard. More individualized. No system for addressing national gaps #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MK response: CMS should publish regional/national data and that would drive CME curriculum. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
From here on out, “MK” refers to Murray Kopelow. OK? OK. Great
-
CME “State of the Union”
-
Up next: Murray Kopelow w/ “State of the Union” #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MK: Most non-accreditations come from initial applicants #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MK: 137 medical schools; 124 are accredited providers. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Dr. Kopelow followed this up by saying that when they discussed this with the schools that were not accredited, they found that most of them worked in joint-sponsorship with other providers.
-
MK: Since Nov 2008 – 102 medical schools have undergone reaccred. Are “above avg” in amount w/ AwC #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
AwC = Accreditation with Commendation.
-
MK: Most common compliance problem is C7 (SCS2) e.g. not disclosing COI (my side note: C’mon people! Seriously…) #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
I mean, really. If it’s a CME activity, you have to provide disclosure. Every.Time. It’s not that hard a concept to understand. Sheesh! (Now I’m annoyed…)
-
Up next: Addressing questions from the audience. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
RSS’s (Regularly Scheduled Series [A.K.A Grand Rounds])
-
Q: Are global objectives for RSS’s ok, rather than for individual sessions? A: Yes. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Q: RSS eval requirements A: You need to have info to meet C11. It’s up to provider to decide how that is done. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Measuring Learner Change
-
Q: Please share options for measuring learner change in addition to commitment to change. Anyone? #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
From audience: Ask clinical question pre/post/follow-up. Ask what they are now doing in practice. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Personal opinion: there seems to be a gap between what ACCME considers “acceptable” outcomes & what other stakeholders accept #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
I’ll explain. Dr. Kopelow used the following as an example of one way to measure change:Ask your audience to raise their hand if they will make a change in their practice based on what they learn.80% raise their hand. Thats a measure.Now ask an individual what specifically they will change. That’s another measureAsk the audience to raise their hand if they will change the same change in their practice as that individual. That’s another measure.And so on.This is acceptable measurement of outcomes for the ACCME and for your files (as long as you document it, of course). Now, how do you think it would fly if you submitted a grant request and in your proposal, you outlined the process above as your method for measuring outcomes? Maybe it would be perfectly fine. I have my doubts though…
-
Joint sponsorship
-
Q: What mechanisms do providers use to ascertain that standards are being followed in joint sponsorship? #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Answer from audience: educate/training necessary for joint sponsors on standards. Need oversight from accredited provider. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Answer from audience: main issues with joint sponsorship is that frequently JS’s “don’t get it”. Our job is to make them understand #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Personal opinion: if you have a lot of headaches with joint sponsors, maybe you’re working with the wrong orgs… #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
I’ve had many positive experiences working with joint sponsors. If your partners are causing you problems, don’t partner with them. There are plenty of others out there who do. I know, I know…easy for me to say. The unspoken issue here is $$$. I get it. Still, at some point the headaches aren’t worth the accreditation fee.
-
MK: most of orgs who have dropped accreditation are small orgs w/ 1-2 meetings a year. Not cost effective, JS better. MK agrees. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MOC
-
MK: ACCME working w/ MOC to align objectives. Just finished meeting w/ stakeholders to discuss. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MK: believes direction MOC is going is that boards will require delegates get CME that satisfies competencies #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Kate Regnier: providers are using RSS’s to start the process of teaching “What is MOC?” and then build on that over time #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Financials of CME
-
Q: Does the ACCME have plans to lobby Congress to consider funding CME? A: the ACCME does not lobby #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Q: How are other Medical Schools handling the financials of CME? #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
A: Some institutions are moving from considering CME a perk to considering it a strategic asset & increasing internal funds #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Social Media
-
Q: Does the ACCME have any plans to dip their toe in the social media waters? #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
I honestly don’t remember if I submitted this question or not. Probably. It sounds like me.
-
A: Other than a blog, do not see value of Fbook, Twitter, Linkedin for what they do. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Hey, a blog from the ACCME would be cool.
-
I disagree, but whatever. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MK: ACCME supports providers using SoMe to facilitate change in new ways. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
ACCME has examined social media and does not see a way that they can use it currently. Supports its use by providers, though #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Here’s a few of my own suggestions on how ACCME could use SoMe http://wp.me/p1zifw-5QvLPD #CMEchat #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
First, let me say that I was happy to hear Dr. Kopelow say that the ACCME supports engagement in social media by their providers. That’s definitely a step in the right direction. However, I disagree with two other points that were made.1) I think it’s a mistake to assume that the primary target audience for the use of social media in their profession are currently high school and college aged kids. I know plenty of people that age who couldn’t care less about Facebook or Twitter, just as I know plenty of people in their 40’s and 50’s who use those platforms every single day. These tools are being used by professionals in their 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, etc RIGHT NOW. Will that audience grow as the Millennials age? Yeah, probably. But we don’t need to wait for that.2) I DO think their is a way for the ACCME to use social media (of course). Here is the link to the blog post I mentioned in my tweet above:
-
A Theoretical Social Media Strategy For The ACCMEI have certainly done my share of whining and complaining about the ACCME, but I will give them credit for this: every time I have emaile…0
likes·
0
comments -
Here’s an example of why I think a social media strategy for the ACCME is important. Check out the series of tweets below fromlater in the Town Hall meeting.
-
MK: if there is no potential for COI (based on content: no mention of products/services of CI)… (n/1) #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
…there is no need to collect COI disclosure froms from faculty. Still need to disclose “No COI” to audience. (n/2) #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
I think I got that last point by MK right. Got a little confused during the explanation… #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
This was a key learning nugget for me from this meeting. It was something new that I learned and was obvious from the reaction of the other participants that it was new to them, too. It is something that I think is valuable info that CME professionals from all provider types would like to know. So, what is the best channel for the ACCME to distribute this bit of information? Send out a mass email? Maybe, but I’m not sure it’s so important that an email needs to be sent to everyone on the ACCME’s mailing list. That would get annoying after awhile. But, if the ACCME had a Linkedin page or a Facebook page, it would be an easy process for them to write a quick update to let people know about this piece of information.
-
And…break. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
For anyone interested in more CME discussion, here’s my The CME Guy facebook page http://www.facebook.com/theCMEguy #CMEchat #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
That’s just blatant promotion right there…
-
And we’re back with Survey Responses… #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Centralized COI Collection
-
Gaps/Needs to be addressed by ACCME: 1) centralized COI collection 2)reduced documentation 3)more focus on data driven goals #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MK: IOM is working on centralized national COI database. Dont know if will come to fruition. ACEHP has something in works too #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Documentation
-
MK: We COULD just drop documentation, but is important to have a paper trail for verification. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
MK: What could ACCME do differently for documentation? #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
From the audience: Major complaint from faculty is the need to constantly disclose COI. #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Audience member asks if we have lost sight of our goal of improving pt care and become too focused on getting “that piece of paper” #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Reaccreditation
-
MK question: Does the reaccreditation process add value to what you do? #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
A: Here are what stakeholders have said #accmeTH http://pic.twitter.com/pGtslcq60
likes·
0
comments -
Poll question to audience: Does the Accreditation Process add value to CME? 71% Yes; 9% No; 20% I’m not sure #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Poll: Would you make changes to the accreditation process? 75% Yes, 6% No, 19% I’m not sure #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
Interesting: I asked Q about surveyors surveying orgs from similar provider type. ACCME response: see it as positive not negative #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
My exact question was whether the ACCME considers COI for their surveyors, particularly in the context of restricting surveyors from surveying organizations from the same provider type as their own organization. Dr. Kopelows response was that the ACCME certainly considers COI of their surveyors in terms of previous business relationships, etc, but they do not restrict them from surveying certain provider types. In fact, they prefer surveyors from similar provider types as the organizations being surveyed, since they might have a better understanding of how they’re run, their processes, etc.
-
ACCME does have monitoring in place for COI of business relationships, etc of surveyors, but not for like provider types #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
For AwC: C15 is redundant & C22 is general. Might drop them & replace with others (eg: data showing you changed practice) #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments -
And we’re done. Thanks to the ACCME for the webinar and more food for thought #accmeTH0
likes·
0
comments
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
-
Links
Thanks Derek, for making the time to put this together – it is appreciated.
Thanks! Just trying to practice what I preach…
Thanks, Derek!
My pleasure, Anne.
Great to read about the lack of need for a disclosure document if content does not contain mention of products or services. Did not know that either and faculty certainly do get weary of signing disclosures over and over. I hope the IMQ in Calif agrees with this stance. Derek, thank you so much for providing this synopsis of the meeting. Much appreciated.
You’re truly welcome, Candace. I’m thrilled to hear you found this helpful. That’s my goal with the blog, so it’s nice to hear!